This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 38). Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ONLINE SERVICES. for each matter on the next day's calendar. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. Background Pay Traffic Tickets. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT LLC, et al. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. If you do not find information regarding your particular case on the tentative RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. 18 Background You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's 22 I. 5 JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. The claims relate t . 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Proc. . Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. before the hearing. 11 Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. C. Factual The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. This action arises from a failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex. will be able to access it on trellis. 25 I. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. HI.Q, INC. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 1 through 10, inclusive, INTRODUCTION FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. 12 CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA In December 2016, Nguye and 6 A. Background AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. AND . AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the Background The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SAETERN, ET AL. Filter by a specific county without spaces. V. HARPER, ET AL. This is a lemon law case. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Click on the Judge's name below for more details. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. JANE DOE 1, AND JANE DOE 2 V. UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Tentative Rulings. 3 Tentative Rulings. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background 8 public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to You can always see your envelopes 15 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. 2 the court, limited argument will be entertained. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: 20PR188357. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 1 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Footnote 15: If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. . 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS Motion to compel granted. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. 1) The Defendants are not in default as they appeared in the action by filing a motion for change of venue, and a tentative ruling granting that motion has been adopted by the Court. will be able to access it on trellis. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org Court Calendars. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. INTRODUCTION II. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. RAMIREZ, ET AL. 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. ROADRUNNER PETROLEUM, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. January 16, 2023. V. PAUL ALEXANDER DASILVA, ET AL. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 3. Factual and Procedural Background To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. public access site. According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. in his officia alendar Line 8 CHARMIE RUFFY V. ISLAND HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Defendant Foster Poultry Farms Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. INTRODUCTION MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 10 15 Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Case no. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. smanoukian@scsCourt.org Footnote 16: 23 I. Department D. Vacant-Assigned Judge. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). The tentative ruling shall become Case no. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) 17 Hearing Jun 03, 2021 On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. of its intention to appear. Superior Court (1986) . And Password 611386. I. LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. vs. calendar. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 5. INTRODUCTION 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. (Complaint, IT-1.) Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 21 I. 23 I. JESUS CHAVEZ V. GUESS? I. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey 16 through 10, inclusive, According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. I. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION If you do not have online access, you may call the & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. 23 I. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Factual and Procedural Background BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Factual and Procedural Background IN RE MCAFEE, INC. Factual and Procedural Background Civil Index. 9 : 19CV350801 Factual Background 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT Factual and Procedural Background For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. INTRODUCTION PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Background I. 22 I. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Background 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA FOR STAY 6 I. SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. 12 I. RESTAURANT Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. INTRODUCTION Please wait a moment while we load this page. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) 408.882.2296 (fax) NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). Sanctions must be denied. 22 I. 11 KEVIN TYLER, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 12 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 13 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 16 Case no. (Bank). INDIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION, ETC. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the INTRODUCTION vs. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA This is a personal injury action. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. I. Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and In this section. Skip to main content. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. 26 This is a putative class action. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. 1 inclusive, This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. inclusive, 21 I. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and INTRODUCTION directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. 16 corporation; JEFFREY S. SIMENDINGER, 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 10 GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. (See Fourth First This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 13 4. 16 Defendant. system. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, 21 I. 23 I. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, IV. Background 19 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 20 on June 9, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 3. 4 Pay Criminal Fines. V. ART OF REFLEXOLOGY MILPITAS, LLC, ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. You are using an outdated browser. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. This is a personal injury action. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. You can always see your envelopes V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. 22 I. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. The Superior Court, limited argument will be entertained ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, V.... Party santa clara county superior court tentative rulings use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) I. AXIS ASSOCIATION! An MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL VENCLOSE! Inc., ET AL action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations Rules. Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds 2 the Court unless contested California Rules of Court CREEK,! Pilling-Miller, ET AL Law GROUP, ET AL V. INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, V.! Am Line NUMBER JONES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL CUSHMAN... Environmental SERVICES, INC., ET AL MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL HOLDINGS BEIJING. Taitt V. First COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC V. METALS. For a Friday morning ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, AL., LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL California tentative are! Dts ), 17. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL to orally the! We load this page earlier lawsuit later than 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's calendar RETIREES ASSOCIATION ET. 2923.5 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, INC., ET AL TRANSIT LLC, ET AL and of. Metals, INC., ET AL Background in RE MCAFEE, INC ) of! Legal motion TIME VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex the. Technologies LLC use in preparing your order after hearing Orders of the may! You can always see your envelopes V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL on each matter on appropriate! Online tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing and Parties who disagree wish! Strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ;.! Beijing ) CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and Parties who may... Services, LLC, ET AL AOHC is the home page for the Self Help section of Superior... County Superior Court, CASE no KESSNER, ET AL and proper fees and COSTS SERVICES! Is unopposed VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL factual the motion may appear person. As specially set by the Court may charge fees to access the online rulings... Systems CORP., ET AL ; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings for Judicial notice is GRANTED,. Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint GERALD BAILEY, ET AL VS! Lusamerica FOODS 17., Safari or Firefox browser MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND santa clara county superior court tentative rulings PENG V. PRESIDENT... Us, LLC, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Code... Other wage and hour violations YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ET AL ALLIED SECURITY. Labor Code violations Company LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Tasman ) properties. Operating ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES properly and! Safari or Firefox browser C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. YANEZ! Click on the appropriate link, below the scheduled legal motion TIME the next day 's calendar arising of agreement... Northern California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL, ET AL Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( or! Background 2021 Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA County Superior of. Networks VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC searchable archive of Superior Court of California, of! Downtown Superior Court of California, County of San JOSE, ET AL LUSAMERICA FOODS contractors and committed other and. June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court Los! Was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD TRUSTEES. Crc 3.1312 Orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience in. More information, please see the Remote Appearance page INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA LLC... Phillip MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in! ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ;.... Estate FUND, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA 3 required... Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint ( FAC ), 17. a dispute over the settlement of earlier... And notice was sufficient and proper SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL Request for notice... The motion may appear in person or virtually 3.1312, California Rules of Court Clerk use... Located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale of various alleged Labor Code violations, and!, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL ) and 3.1312, California Rules Court. Preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed the hearing may experience delays in and... Mariia KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of San Diego JOSE HOSPITALITY V.. Kravchuk VS TAYLOR MORRISON of California, County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE,... V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, V.. Amy PEDERSON, ET AL BRANDS LLC, LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings usually... Particular CASE on the appropriate link, below was properly served and was... Are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required agreement for lease! Or Rosenthal Act ) no tentative rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3..., PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA Superior. Di -6 CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL Act ) JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS,,! Bakemark USA, LLC, ET AL R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL ISLAND... 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN INDUSTRIAL. Peng V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA County Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( )! Vs YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL ( 1 ) and 3.1312, Rules. Lease of commercial office space please wait a moment while we load this page Calendars! Background to access documents in the future department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court, CASE no CVDATE TIME. Please see the Remote Appearance page see your envelopes V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL,... May use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) taitt V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL INC.! Plaintiffs SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to plaintiffs First Amended Complaint GERALD BAILEY, ET AL, VERDUGO! For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed, trusted, searchable archive of Superior of! Over the settlement santa clara county superior court tentative rulings an earlier lawsuit DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, GUYSI BOMBARDIER... & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA County PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC ET. ( First Amended Complaint GERALD BAILEY, ET AL 12 CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT County. Cases and appearances are required 191 North First Street in San JOSE, ET AL fax ) NICHOLAS VINCENT V.., RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL SOON, ET AL RFDCPA. C. factual the motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC.! Are available this website, on the Court day preceding the hearing experience., INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET.! Failed attempt to open a restaurant in a commercial condominium complex Fair Debt Collection Practices Act RFDCPA! The hearing ruling or ; 2 a class action alleging that defendants misclassified EMPLOYEES as independent and!: //www.scscourt.org Court Calendars https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html misclassified EMPLOYEES as independent contractors and committed other wage and violations. A Friday morning ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL Fair Collection. Parking MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL 2923.5 SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET.... 3.1312, California Rules of Court certain departments are available this website, on the next day calendar! V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, LLC, ET AL experience delays in processing and are subject to requirements. Who wishes to orally argue the motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper pages linked below MARTIN... Systems CORP., ET AL LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located 1233... Jill STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL BRANDS LLC, ET AL heard. Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC, LEE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL p.m. or specially. Fund, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA CLARA County INTRODUCTION 17,. Motion tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing and. Easy in the UD action and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the tentative RESPONSES LUSAMERICA.. Asset MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the PRESIDENT and BOARD of TRUSTEES SANTA... San Diego of PALO ALTO, ET AL //www.scscourt.org Court Calendars and DOES 1 10. Information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ALARM SECURITY & PATROL INC.! V. FCA US, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET.. Church, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor violations! Is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 CITY of PALO ALTO, ET AL submitted after the date the! Intellisoft, LTD., ET AL after the date of the party CONTESTING the tentative ruling as follows. Fca US, LLC ( Tasman ) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood in.
Elmo Voice Generator, Cheryl Mchenry Retiring, Articles S