I will however acknowledge that the MCAD systems are only a part of a larger software eco-system. Bad internet? As far as I can tell, the cloud-based CAD are simply not as in-demand as Autodesk would have liked. Onshape by Onshape Remove. As an apples-to-apples comparison, the criteria I will be judging these programs by is; Which program is better for Mechanical CAD product development? Onshape is cloud-based and will run on certain browsers, whereas Fusion 360 requires a web app to access the cloud I also specifically asked the AutoDesk rep why this software was so inexpensive, given the broad capability it clearly has. This may also beg the question; “Then why is it so much more expensive?” Well, my friend, that is a great question. Compare Autodesk Fusion 360 vs Onshape. Doing this properly aids in diminishing the effort and time required for the product development process. For me, this is a necessity, because I often have issues with internet or am in a location where I don’t have access to internet. Main Differences Between Onshape vs Fusion 360. The only thing you need to start using Onshape is a stable internet connection and a web browser. Onshape has no offline mode at the time this article was written. Need support? (2020), AutoCAD vs Inventor | Head-to-Head Comparison (2020), SolidWorks vs Fusion 360 | The Ultimate Comparison (2020), AutoCAD Vs Fusion 360 | Head-to-Head Battle (2020), Inventor Vs Fusion 360 | Head-to-head Comparison (2020), CATIA vs Solidworks | Head-to-Head Comparison (2020), SketchUp Vs AutoCAD | In-depth, Unbiased Comparison (2020), Check out the Fusion 360 or Onshape learning library for training videos and courses, Look on forums for specific answers to specific questions, Onshape’s sudden and dramatic price increase, Fusion 360’s in-app capabilities exceed that of Onshape (you need plug-ins in order to do certain things that are already in place in Fusion 360. Ask a question to our Community Support category. Save up to 70% on top products! Compare Fusion 360 alternatives for your business or organization using the curated list below. Onshape vs Fusion 360 [2020]: Which Software is Best? It didn’t take me long to reach the conclusion that Fusion 360 is my clear choice, at least at this time. From complex machines, including cars or airplanes, to small printable products such as bottles with twist-on caps, Onshape and Fusion360 have all the tools programed into the platform to take any such product from inception to manufacture. If the team develops a certain aspect of the product model, but later decides that they like most of their changes, but want to backtrack on a few things to an earlier version, then those changes can be easily reverted while the new changes are kept. There is an active, saved history of changes made to the product model. We should see Fusion 360’s price increase as the popularity of this software increases. With these features, users can increase functionality through the Onshape CAD, along with other add-ons available through the Onshape app store. As your new program gains popularity, eventually it can be adopted by the BIG industry names that require the best CAD software to produce their products. For starters, they’re both cloud-based, and they both offer multi-part design as part of their 3D modeling options. You can create a series of gears that all turn when the gear shaft turns. Onshape has an extensive library of Plug-Ins. It took me a while to break myself of the paradigm that Solidworks and/or Inventor must be better than Onshape or Fusion 360 because they are so much more expensive. Some of them are free, some of them are paid for both platforms. There are those who would say it is actually BETTER than Solidworks, but I like to say that the functionality that you have in Solidworks is also available in Fusion 360. You aren’t lacking serious functionality in Fusion 360 that is exclusive to Solidworks? They wouldn’t. These could be robotics manufacturers, design and product development firms, micro-precision shops, or drive train producers. Yes! With the Onshape system, several users can access the same design at the same time. Bottom Line Up Front Summary: I recommend the more user friendly, widely adopted, and better supported Fusion 360 product here, if I have to pick just one. Inventor offers industry-standard product design and engineering tools for 3D mechanical design, visualization, simulation, and documentation. Required fields are marked *. Fusion 360 caters to everything a user may need f3or electronics, including combining ECAD and MCAD. After comparing Fusion 360 and Onshape side by side with each criterion in mind, I am casting my vote for Fusion 360. There are more features available through the standard platform of Fusion 360 which are not in Onshape (at least not at this time) such as wiring, simulation, electronics programming etc. Also, the price of Fusion 360 is WAY better than Onshape (at the time this article was written). Easy to use. It is not too difficult to learn Fusion 360, so long as you can understand the basic differences between CAD software and modelling software. However, unlike Fusion 360 which requires a web app, You don’t need to download, install, or update anything to access Onshape as all the software’s features are available over the internet. Offer ends soon! With the Collaboration feature, users can create an environment that allows teams, customers, vendors, and stakeholders to work together from anywhere on the globe. Each product's score is calculated with real-time data from verified user reviews, to help you make the best choice between these two options, and decide which one is best for your business needs. Your email address will not be published. When it comes to these two software options, you’ll notice a few similarities. It is stable. User data is kept in the cloud for security purposes. Onshape is entirely cloud-based, so you can access it anywhere with solid Internet. Onshape - Tech-net signed up to be a representative. Fusion 360 for example is free for most hobbyist use, but it's still a proprietary package and you're depending on AutoDesk's good will.